Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826831›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2025

Generative AI as Third Agent: Large Language Models and the Transformation of the Clinician-Patient Relationship.

Hugo de O Campos, Daniel Wolfe, Hongzhou Luan, Ida Sim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hugo de O Campos *Strategic Advisory Board, Computational Precision Health, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, 2195 Hearst Ave, Suite 120, Oakland, CA, 94720, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5540-4115
Daniel Wolfe *Computational Precision Health, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-0425-6667
Hongzhou Luan *Computational Precision Health, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5833-3500
Ida Sim *Computational Precision Health, University of California, Berkeley and University of California, San Francisco, Berkeley, CA, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1045-8459

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in health care has significant implications for patient-clinician interactions. Practical and ethical challenges have emerged with the adoption of large language models (LLMs) that respond to prompts from clinicians, patients, and caregivers. With an emphasis on patient experience, this paper examines the potential of LLMs to act as facilitators, interrupters, or both in patient-clinician relationships. Drawing on our experiences as patient advocates, computer scientists, and physician informaticists working to improve data exchange and patient experience, we examine how LLMs might enhance patient engagement, support triage, and inform clinical decision-making. While affirming LLMs as a tool enabling the rise of the "AI patient," we also explore concerns surrounding data privacy, algorithmic bias, moral injury, and the erosion of human connection. To help navigate these tensions, we outline a conceptual framework that anticipates the role and impact of LLMs in patient-clinician dynamics and propose key areas for future inquiry. Realizing the potential of LLMs requires careful consideration of which aspects of the patient-clinician relationship must remain distinctly human and why, even when LLMs offer plausible substitutes. This inquiry should draw on ethics and philosophy, aligned with AI imperatives such as patient-centered design and transparency, and shaped through collaboration between technologists, health care providers, and patient communities.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceempowermentgenerative AIhealthcarelarge language modelpatient-clinician relationshippatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID40826831
PMCPMC12361538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.