ArticleInternational journal of mental health nursing2025
Support for Recovery in Mental Health: A Delphi Study From the Family's Perspective.
Article in International journal of mental health nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recovery in Mental Health: A Synthesis of the Perspectives of Experts by Experience, Recovery-Oriented Professionals and Family Caregivers in Relation to the CHIME and SPICE Frameworks.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- Voices from Within: Saudi Arabian Women's Lived Experiences of First-Episode Psychosis, Hospitalisation, and Recovery Pathways.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Support for Recovery in Mental Health: A Delphi Study From the Family's Perspective.International journal of mental health nursing · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mental health services are increasingly adopting a recovery-oriented approach that prioritises human rights and user empowerment. In this evolving landscape, family members, who are often the primary support network for mental health service users, face unique challenges in assisting a person's recovery. This study aims to establish an international consensus on supportive actions for the recovery process and to identify key facilitators and obstacles to providing support from the perspective of families of mental health service users. Methodological rigour was ensured by following the CREDES checklist. A total of 53 family caregivers from around the world agreed to participate in a three-round e-Delphi study. Consensus was reached on 47 statements detailing supportive actions, among which an awareness of the user's needs was considered the most important. The study also identified 42 facilitators of providing support, with openness to learning and trusting the user being the most significant. A total of 23 obstacles were also acknowledged, with the major barrier being the emotional or physical absence of the caregiver. These results highlight the multifaceted nature of support and the critical role families play in a person's recovery journey. The findings also underscore the need for training programmes based on these consensus statements so as to empower families to provide more effective and person-centred support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.