ArticleCancer cell international2025
Precise stratification of prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients based on pre- and postoperative genomic information.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Circulating tumor DNA-guided early detection and minimal residual disease monitoring in pancreatic and biliary cancers: evidence, barriers, and opportunities.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has the highest mortality rate among all cancers; hence, multidisciplinary treatment is essential for patients with PDAC. Although the resectability status, tumour marker, KRAS circulating tumour DNA (mutKRAS-ctDNA) mutations, and GATA binding 6 (GATA6) expression status are promising prognostic biomarkers, their effective integration before and after surgery remains unclear.
methodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients with PDAC who had undergone radical resection were enrolled, and pre- and postoperative independent factors associated with poor prognosis were identified using Cox hazard modelling. Risk stratification systems were developed using the identified prognostic factors and investigated for the ability to predict prognosis.
resultsA total of 91 patients with PDAC were included (median follow-up duration, 28 months). Borderline resectable or locally advanced cancer at diagnosis, elevated carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) level, and mutKRAS-ctDNA-positive status were identified as independent preoperative factors associated with poor prognosis. The postoperative factors significantly associated with shorter overall survival were low GATA6 expression, elevated CA19-9 level, and mutKRAS-ctDNA-positive status. Finally, the preoperative and postoperative risk scoring systems developed using Cox modelling hazard ratio values could significantly stratify prognosis after curative resection for PDAC.
conclusionA risk stratification system based on liquid biopsy, specialised for each phase (pre- and post-surgery), has been proven to be a useful, simple, and practical prognostic prediction clinical tool to determine the optimal multidisciplinary treatment protocol for PDAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.