Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826452›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Parental experiences from home visits in the New Families programme: an observational and interview study.

Bettina Holmberg Fagerlund, Kari Glavin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bettina Holmberg FagerlundFaculty of Health Sciences, VID Specialized University, Vinderen, P.O. Box 184, Oslo, N-0319, Norway. bettina.fagerlund@vid.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0512-5537
Kari GlavinFaculty of Health Sciences, VID Specialized University, Vinderen, P.O. Box 184, Oslo, N-0319, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6697-2764

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to explore the experiences of parents-to-be and first-time parents with home visits in the New Families programme and how these visits unfolded. The programme was introduced in the City of Oslo in 2019. It offers early support to expectant first-time parents through home visits conducted by public health nurses, starting from week 28 of pregnancy and continuing until the child is 2 years old. The family determines the frequency and content of the visits.

methodsAn interpretive description approach was utilized, adhering to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist. Data were collected through eight participant observations and six qualitative interviews. Seventeen parents participated in the study.

resultsFindings indicate that expectant parents had limited knowledge of child health centre services and the public health nurse's role. Many reported not receiving timely or adequate information about the services or the purpose of the New Families home visits. Despite this, they described the visits as positive experiences, felt treated as equals, and appreciated meeting the nurse who would support them after the birth.

conclusionsThe content and focus of the New Families programme should be clearly communicated to expectant parents before the home visit. Some public health nurses may also benefit from greater clarity about the programme's purpose and content, which could help avoid misunderstandings among parents. Raising awareness about the purpose of home visits and providing accessible information may encourage more parents to accept the offer of a home visit.

Indexed as

Child healthHome visitInterpretive descriptionParentPublic health nurseQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID40826452
PMCPMC12359979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.