Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826450›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Key informants' perspectives on simulation-based learning experiences: a qualitative study.

Liz Kingston, Kathleen Markey, Owen Doody, Louise Murphy, Pauline Meskell, Therese Hennessy, Mairead Moloney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Liz KingstonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland. liz.kingston@ul.ie.
Kathleen MarkeySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Owen DoodySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Louise MurphySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Pauline MeskellSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Therese HennessySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Mairead MoloneySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

Higher Education Authority, National Forum for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning, TL19UL1452/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation is a proven student-centred pedagogy, used in undergraduate nursing and midwifery education programmes as an effective strategy to support knowledge and skills development and ensure practice readiness. In this study, simulation-based learning experiences (SBLEs) were used to redress missed learning opportunities in real-life settings during restrictive conditions. Simulations were conducted in a safe controlled environment, affording students opportunities to practice, and develop the required skills for practice.

methodsThe study aimed to explore key informants' perspectives on the introduction of SBLEs during a global pandemic. A qualitative descriptive research design was chosen. Purposeful sampling was used to invite pre-internship students (n = 95) and facilitators (n = 9) to participate in focus group interviews (FGIs) to share experiences of SBLEs conducted in one university in the South of Ireland. A semi-structured interview guide facilitated the FGIs. Two student FGIs were conducted (n = 10) and one FGI was conducted with facilitators (n = 6) who were either faculty members (n = 5) or clinical staff (n = 1). An inductive thematic analysis framework was used to analyse the data.

resultsFindings suggest that when adequately resourced with personnel and other practical resources, simulation is an effective and authentic student-centred pedagogical approach, that can support safe and effective pre-internship learning. It was perceived to enhance practice readiness of nursing students for professional practice in the real world. In the context of the restrictive conditions of a global pandemic it provided a safe learning environment, when public health restrictions impacted educational delivery. Student participants reported that peer feedback was a positive aspect of the simulation experience, enhancing interactivity and promoting active engagement in the learning process. Facilitators emphasised the importance of formal training, particularly in debriefing, as essential to the effective delivery of simulation pedagogy, ensuring both academic and psychological safety for students and staff. They also appreciated the opportunity for informal debriefing of the debriefer, recognising it as a valuable form of reflective practice.

conclusionWhen formalising the integration of simulation into nursing curricula, it is essential that educators prioritise structured training for simulated participants and ensure comprehensive preparation in debriefing methodologies. Future research should examine the long-term effects of simulation-based pedagogy on knowledge translation and the development of practice readiness among nursing students.

Indexed as

Clinical skillsKnowledge acquisition nursing studentsSimulation-based educationSkill development

Identifiers

PMID40826450
PMCPMC12359827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.