Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2025
Liberal or restrictive transfusion for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: a target trial emulation using the OBLEX study data.
Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03714048 (International Observational Study on BLood Management for Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
International Observational Study on BLood Management for Mechanical Circulatory Support Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (OBLEX)
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient blood management in general intensive care patients.Intensive care medicine · 2026Review
- Major haemorrhage and blood product utilisation in patients receiving VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock: a multicentre observational study (OBLEX).Critical care (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Early red blood cell transfusion burden, hemoglobin at first transfusion, and in-hospital mortality in patients supported with veno-arterial ECMO: a multicenter cohort study.Annals of intensive care · 2026Article
- Letter to the editor regarding 'Liberal or restrictive transfusion for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients: a target trial emulation using the OBLEX study data'.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
- Crossing the line: blood transfusion thresholds in ECMO.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal transfusion threshold for patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) remains uncertain.
methodsWe used data from OBLEX (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03714048), an international, prospective, observational study conducted across 12 centres in Australia, Europe, and North America between 2019 and 2022. The study collected information on patient demographics, bleeding risk factors, transfusion practices during the first seven days of ECMO, and in-hospital mortality. Using these data, we emulated a target trial comparing the effects of liberal transfusion practice (transfusion initiated at Hb ≥ 90 g/L) and restrictive transfusion practice (transfusion initiated at Hb ≤ 70 g/L) on hospital mortality within seven days of ECMO initiation. Sequential trials approach was used to estimate the causal contrast.
resultsA total of 534 patients were included, with 46% dying during hospitalisation. After accounting for potential confounders, the liberal transfusion practice demonstrated a modest survival benefit within the first two days of ECMO, with differences in survival probabilities of 12% (95% CI 3% to 21%) at day 2 and 13% (95% CI 2% to 25%) at day 3, corresponding to the number needed to treat (NNT) of 8 and 7 respectively. No differences in survival benefit were found after day 3. These results were consistent across sensitivity and exploratory analyses.
conclusionThis target trial emulation study suggests that a liberal transfusion threshold may provide a modest survival benefit during the early course of VA-ECMO, but no benefit afterwards. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings, assess clinical adoption, and investigate underlying mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.