ArticleBMC nursing2025
Impact of violence on emotional exhaustion risk of registered nurses in Germany: a Bayesian analysis of cross-Sectional data with multiple imputations.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Psychometric validation of the Taiwanese nurse burnout scale.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Occupational injury and job esteem in relation to burnout dimensions among nurses in Beijing: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The prevalence and predictors of burnout among employees of the national emergency medical services system: evidence from Poland.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Nurses' experience of violence and post-traumatic stress disorder in Germany: a cross-sectional study.Journal of research in nursing : JRN · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedical workers are at risk of burnout due to various stressors, affecting their health, reducing quality of care, and threatening the retention of a resilient workforce. Among these stressors, workplace violence has emerged as a contributor to an increased risk of burnout among nurses. However, evidence from the German context remains limited. This study investigates the association between the frequency of workplace violence and the risk of the primary dimension of burnout, emotional exhaustion.
methodsThis analysis is based on data from a German survey of registered nurses, measuring burnout risk and experiences of workplace violence. Multiple imputations were applied to missing data. The primary outcome, emotional exhaustion, was assessed with the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Extensive literature searches guided variable selection and prior elicitation for ordinal Bayesian regression. The main independent variables measured self-reported frequencies of physical and verbal violence from different perpetrators.
resultsA total of 4317 RNs responded to the survey. Multiple imputed estimates revealed a high prevalence of frequent verbal (21.6%) and physical (3.8%) violence by patients and their families. High frequency verbal and physical violence perpetrated by staff was reported by 7.8% and 9.7% of respondents, respectively. Bayesian regression analyses across multiple imputed datasets showed a robust association between all types of workplace violence and increased risk of emotional exhaustion.
conclusionRepeated exposure to physical and verbal violence is a major contributor to the risk of burnout in the emotional exhaustion dimension among German RNs. Given its high prevalence, there is an urgent need for reforms and policy measures to prevent violence and address its impact. Updated evidence and targeted interventions are essential to safeguard workers and maintain a resilient nursing workforce. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.