ArticleBMC medical education2025
Anatomy education at central Europe medical schools: a qualitative analysis of educators' pedagogical knowledge, methods, practices, and challenges.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, there has been a growing demand for a unified education standard, spurred by sustainability initiatives such as the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 and the increasing internationalisation of higher education. The World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) promote accreditation process for international medical education institutions that provide curricula in English. However, some Central European Medical Schools offering such curricula are not fully aligned with WFME accreditation standards. Organisers of human anatomy courses at these schools are seeking to improve their skills and abilities to deliver high-quality teaching effectively in multicultural and multilingual environments. A survey conducted by the Erasmus + Strategic Partnership project LEANbody, which aims to reach for quality management tools to teach human anatomy effectively in a multicultural and multilingual learning space, revealed that over 70% (49/69) of anatomists in Hungary, the Czech Republic, and Croatia are unfamiliar with international quality standards for medical education and the concept of student-centred pedagogy.
aimsThis study seeks to understand educators’ perceptions of pedagogical knowledge and concepts/frameworks, such as constructive alignment (CA), Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs), in relation to student-centred pedagogy and their anatomy teaching practices. The study also investigates perceived gaps at the institutional, departmental, and individual levels concerning anatomy teaching and the pedagogical practices that should be promoted.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study using a qualitative approach was used for this purpose. In 2022, face-to-face or online interviews were conducted with 14 anatomy educators including course organisers from Zagreb, Masaryk and Pécs Universities.
resultsWe found that most educators had not received formal teacher training on teaching methods prior to starting anatomy teaching and were unfamiliar with such pedagogical frameworks as CA, even though they were familiar with the concept of ILOs. Thematic analysis was applied to open-ended questions and the umbrella theme that emerged was “Transforming Anatomy Teaching and Learning in the Glocal Classroom: Navigating the Intersections of Pedagogical Practice, Constructive Alignment, and Student-Centred frameworks”. Two themes and 5 subthemes were identified from the data. The study presents recommendations and a novel framework linking student-centred approaches, CA, and global educational sustainability agendas, such as the sustainable development goal 4 target 7 (SDG4.7) to enhance the quality of anatomy teaching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.