ArticleBMC nursing2025
Structural equation modeling for influencing factors on behavioral intention to adopt medical AI among Chinese nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Performance and Effort Expectancy on AI-Generated Information Adoption Among Chinese Nursing Professionals: Survey-Based SEM Analysis.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Heterogeneity in nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a latent profile analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Factors influencing large language model adoption among dental students: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence literacy and related factors among nursing undergraduates in Northeast China.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Mapping factors associated with nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a scoping review.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Factors associated with the experience of AI tools for creating health education materials: cross-sectional study using an extended UTAUT model.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence readiness and its relationship with thriving at work among Chinese nurses: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Assessing nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence in Kazakhstan: psychometric validation of a nine-item scale.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The Mediating and Moderating Roles of Innovation Climate in the Relationship Between Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence, Creative Self-Efficacy, and Clinical Competence.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- Determinants of off-label drug acceptance in pregnancy: insights from an extended UTAUT model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Factors shaping the adoption of large language models among hospital administrative staff: A cross-sectional survey study.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) shows great potential to improve clinical nursing practices. However, concerns and challenges related to its implementation have led to resistance among nurses, hindering the widespread use of AI tools in healthcare. This study aimed to apply the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to medical AI in Chinese nursing and to examine the relationships specified within the established theoretical framework.
methodsThis study employed a nationwide cross-sectional survey to assess Chinese nurses' demographic characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes toward medical AI. Guided by the UTAUT framework, key constructs like performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention were included, along with perceived risk and trust as additional variables. Data were collected from 8,514 valid questionnaires. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed for analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to construct validity of the extended UTAUT model, followed by evaluation of model fit and estimation of path coefficients. The Bootstrap method was utilized to examine the mediating effects.
results84.0% (7151/8514) of nurses had heard of medical AI, 79.5% (6771/8514) of nurses held optimistic views regarding its prospects, only 17.8% (1512/8514) of nurses had actually utilized it in clinical nursing work. The results of the SEM analysis revealed that performance expectancy (β = 0.074, P < 0.001), effort expectancy (β = 0.158, P < 0.001), social influence (β = 0.039, P < 0.001) and trust (β = 0.670, P < 0.001) had significant positive impacts on behavioral intention of nurses to adopt medical AI, while perceived risk had a significant negative impact (β=-0.013, P = 0.037). In contrast, facilitating conditions did not significantly affect behavioral intention (β=-0.010, P = 0.334). Additionally, the influence of performance expectancy (β = 0.148, P < 0.001), effort expectancy (β = 0.206, P < 0.001), social influence (β = 0.130, P < 0.001) and facilitating conditions (β = 0.074, P < 0.001) on behavioral intention was mediated by trust, highlighting the core role of trust in promoting intention to use AI. Notably, trust did not significantly mediate the relationship between perceived risk and behavioral intention (β=-0.007, P = 0.229).
conclusionsChinese nurses generally express high acceptance of medical AI, but its practical application rate remains low. To facilitate the widespread adoption of AI in nursing settings, future efforts should prioritize improving the accuracy, usability, and accessibility of medical AI. Moreover, initiatives should focus on creating a supportive environment, addressing perceived risks, and fostering greater trust in AI technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.