Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826351›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

Structural equation modeling for influencing factors on behavioral intention to adopt medical AI among Chinese nurses: a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Qianqian Dai, Ming Li, Shiwu Shi, Maoshu Yang, Zhaoyu Wang, Jiaojiao Liao, Zhaoji Li, Yu Liu, Jun Deng, Liyuan Tao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qianqian Dai *Center for Data Science in Clinical Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ming Li *Institute of Social Science Survey, Peking University, Beijing, 100871, China.
Shiwu ShiSchool of Basic Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Maoshu YangSchool of Basic Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhaoyu WangResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jiaojiao LiaoResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Zhaoji LiResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yu LiuDepartment of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, 02129, USA.
Jun DengPeking University First Hospital, Beijing, 100034, China. jun.deng@pkufh.cn.
Liyuan TaoCenter for Data Science in Clinical Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. tendytly@163.com.

Funding

the Major Science and Technology Special Project of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region 2023A03007-5the National Natural Science Foundation of China 82474337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) shows great potential to improve clinical nursing practices. However, concerns and challenges related to its implementation have led to resistance among nurses, hindering the widespread use of AI tools in healthcare. This study aimed to apply the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model to medical AI in Chinese nursing and to examine the relationships specified within the established theoretical framework.

methodsThis study employed a nationwide cross-sectional survey to assess Chinese nurses' demographic characteristics, knowledge, and attitudes toward medical AI. Guided by the UTAUT framework, key constructs like performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, facilitating conditions, and behavioral intention were included, along with perceived risk and trust as additional variables. Data were collected from 8,514 valid questionnaires. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was employed for analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to construct validity of the extended UTAUT model, followed by evaluation of model fit and estimation of path coefficients. The Bootstrap method was utilized to examine the mediating effects.

results84.0% (7151/8514) of nurses had heard of medical AI, 79.5% (6771/8514) of nurses held optimistic views regarding its prospects, only 17.8% (1512/8514) of nurses had actually utilized it in clinical nursing work. The results of the SEM analysis revealed that performance expectancy (β = 0.074, P < 0.001), effort expectancy (β = 0.158, P < 0.001), social influence (β = 0.039, P < 0.001) and trust (β = 0.670, P < 0.001) had significant positive impacts on behavioral intention of nurses to adopt medical AI, while perceived risk had a significant negative impact (β=-0.013, P = 0.037). In contrast, facilitating conditions did not significantly affect behavioral intention (β=-0.010, P = 0.334). Additionally, the influence of performance expectancy (β = 0.148, P < 0.001), effort expectancy (β = 0.206, P < 0.001), social influence (β = 0.130, P < 0.001) and facilitating conditions (β = 0.074, P < 0.001) on behavioral intention was mediated by trust, highlighting the core role of trust in promoting intention to use AI. Notably, trust did not significantly mediate the relationship between perceived risk and behavioral intention (β=-0.007, P = 0.229).

conclusionsChinese nurses generally express high acceptance of medical AI, but its practical application rate remains low. To facilitate the widespread adoption of AI in nursing settings, future efforts should prioritize improving the accuracy, usability, and accessibility of medical AI. Moreover, initiatives should focus on creating a supportive environment, addressing perceived risks, and fostering greater trust in AI technologies.

Indexed as

Behavioral intentionCross-sectional surveyMedical artificial intelligenceNurseUTAUT

Identifiers

PMID40826351
PMCPMC12363024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.