Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826325›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025

Association of prognostic nutritional index and severe abdominal aortic calcification in middle-aged adults: a cross-sectional study.

Yuanming Li, Jing Tang, Yi Zhou, Lishan Bai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuanming LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, 628300, China. liym86@126.com.
Jing TangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, 628300, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Gastroenterology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, 628300, China.
Lishan BaiDepartment of Neonatology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, 628300, China. 18328524181@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prognostic nutritional index (PNI) serves as an indicator of systemic inflammation, immunological function, and nutritional condition in individuals. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential association between PNI and severe abdominal aortic calcification (SAAC) in middle-aged adults.

methodsThe study included 1,436 subjects aged 40-60 years (average age 49.72 years, with females representing 50.97%) from the 2013-2014 NHANES. AAC scores greater than 6 is defined as SAAC. PNI was defined as 5× Lymphocyte Count (10

resultsIn fully adjusted models, each unit increase in PNI was also associated with a 11% increase in the risk of SAAC occurrence [OR (95% CI): 1.11 (1.07, 1.16)]. Subgroup analyses showed that the relationship between PNI and SAAC was modified by hypertension (P-interaction < 0.0001). In the nonhypertensive population, the association between PNI and SAAC was significantly positive.

conclusionsWe found that nutritional status combined with inflammation did not have a protective effect on SAAC. Conversely, in middle-aged individuals (especially those without hypertension), higher PNI scores were associated with a higher risk of SAAC, which was unexpected.

Indexed as

Aorta, AbdominalAortic DiseasesNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentVascular CalcificationAdultAge FactorsBiomarkersCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansLymphocyte CountMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysPredictive Value of TestsALB protein, humanBiomarkersSerum Albumin, HumanAbdominal aortic calcificationCardiovascular diseaseMiddle-aged adultsNHANESPrognostic nutritional index

Identifiers

PMID40826325
PMCPMC12362935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.