ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2025
Radiographic and clinical outcomes of traumatic subtrochanteric femur fracture fixation and reduction methods.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDifferent reduction methods and implant choices for subtrochanteric femur fractures with varying fracture patterns have been described. This study aimed to assess the relationship of fracture patterns, reduction methods, and implant selection with radiographic and clinical outcomes.
methodsA retrospective review of patients aged ≥ 18 with traumatic subtrochanteric fractures between 2016 and 2023 at a Level-1 trauma center was conducted. Patient, surgical, and outcome characteristics were collected. Femoral neck-shaft angle , maximum sagittal cortical displacement, and modified radiographic union score of the tibia (mRUST) adapted to the proximal femur were measured on post-operative radiographs.
resultsAmong 64 patients (mean age 56.1, 70.3% male) with one patient with bilateral injuries, 54 received an intramedullary nail (IMN), 8 a plate, and 3 a nail-plate combination. No differences were observed in AO/OTA fracture patterns between groups. Open reduction was performed in 35 cases and closed or percutaneous reduction in 30 cases. Closed reductions had significantly shorter surgery durations and decreased estimated blood loss (EBL) compared to open reductions (p = 0.028 and p = 0.049, respectively). Radiographically, maximal cortical displacement on lateral imaging was significantly increased in closed or percutaneously reduced fractures compared to open reductions (p = 0.025). IMN fixation was utilized in patients with higher BMI (p = 0.017). IMN fixation resulted in increased maximal cortical displacement on lateral imaging compared to plate and combination nail-plate fixations (p = 0.041). No differences in mRUST at multiple time points were observed in reduction method or implant type. Our average length of follow-up was 132 days. Post-operatively, no differences existed in pain, independent ambulation, complication or revision rates between implants or reduction methods.
conclusionSubtrochanteric fractures treated with open reduction and presence of a plate in the fixation can improve sagittal alignment. Closed/percutaneous reduction decreases surgery duration and estimated blood loss. Regardless of reduction type and implant, adequate reduction, high union rates and successful outcomes are possible. Anatomic reduction and stable fixation are essential in surgical treatment, regardless of approach or implant choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.