Trial reportLasers in medical science2025
Effect of high-intensity laser therapy on supraspinatus tendon elasticity in subacromial impingement syndrome: A double-blind randomized controlled study.
Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The importance of power in photobiomodulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-intensity laser therapy.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study primary aimed to evaluate the effect of high-intensity laser therapy (HILT) on the elasticity of the supraspinatus tendon in participants with subacromial impingement syndrome (SIS) and secondary aimed to evaluate the effect of HILT on pain and function. This randomized controlled double-blind study included 66 participants diagnosed with SIS and were randomly assigned into HILT group (HILT and physical therapy) and control group (sham HILT and physical therapy) and received 10 sessions (five days a week during two weeks). Supraspinatus tendon elasticity was measured by shear wave elastography (SWE). Pain and function were assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) and shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), respectively. Measurements were made at baseline and after treatment. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was accepted as 1.37 for VAS and 13.2 for SPADI. There was no difference in SWE measurements before and after treatment in both groups (p > 0.05). VAS and SPADI showed clinically and statistically significant improvement in the HILT and control groups (p < 0.001). The r value for VAS and SPADI in the HILT group was calculated as 0.97; and 0.97 for VAS and 0.96 for SPADI in the control group. A statistically significant difference was found in VAS and SPADI in the HILT group compared to the control group (p = 0.010, p < 0.001, respectively). However, the differences were not clinically significant (mean differences 0.5 and 6.41, respectively). This study concluded that HILT applied together with physical therapy had no effect on tendon elasticity in the short term. Besides, HILT combined with physical therapy is statistically more effective in reducing pain and improving function than physical therapy alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40826289What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.