ArticleScientific reports2025
A photovoltaic power forecasting method based on the LSTM-XGBoost-EEDA-SO model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A stacked Gradient Boosting-XGBoost ensemble with ridge meta-learner for accurate short-term solar PV power forecasting in smart grids.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Accurate forecasting of photovoltaic optimal points and efficiency using advanced hybrid machine learning models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Photovoltaic (PV) power is significantly influenced by meteorological fluctuations, and its forecasting accuracy is critical for power system dispatching and economic operation. To enhance forecasting precision, this paper proposes a hybrid framework integrating signal decomposition, parallel forecasting, and weight optimization. Firstly, the Thompson-Tau-Newton interpolation method is applied to handle missing data, and key meteorological factors are selected using the Pearson correlation coefficient to reduce input dimensionality. Secondly, the power sequence is decomposed into multi-scale subsequences using Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition (EEMD), which are then reconstructed into low-frequency components (reflecting trend features) and high-frequency components (capturing random fluctuations) based on sample entropy. Furthermore, a parallel XGBoost-LSTM forecasting structure is constructed, XGBoost models the low-frequency components to capture global patterns, while LSTM processes the high-frequency components to learn temporal dependencies. Finally, the Snake Optimization (SO) algorithm is introduced to dynamically optimize the combination weights, enabling adaptive fusion of forecasting results. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed model significantly outperforms standalone benchmark methods. In comparison with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Sparrow Search Algorithm (SSA), and the equal-weight assignment approach for high- and low-frequency component forecasting, the proposed SO algorithm attains the lowest forecasting errors. The proposed method provides a novel approach to high-precision PV power forecasting by integrating multi-modal feature fusion and optimized weight allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.