Article in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Jieyang LiDepartment of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, SUSTech Energy Institute for Carbon Neutrality, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Changhao LuoDepartment of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, SUSTech Energy Institute for Carbon Neutrality, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Huanlei ZhangDepartment of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, SUSTech Energy Institute for Carbon Neutrality, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Zijia HuangDepartment of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, SUSTech Energy Institute for Carbon Neutrality, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.
Zhan JiangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Printed Organic Electronic, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-2626
Jianuo ChenElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4019-0737
Thomas S MillerElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2224-5768
Kun JiangShanghai Key Laboratory of Molecular Catalysis and Innovative Materials, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemistry for Energy Materials, Department of Chemistry, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3148-5058
Rhodri JervisElectrochemical Innovation Lab, Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London, WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2784-7802
Yongye LiangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Printed Organic Electronic, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-8792
Meng LinDepartment of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, SUSTech Energy Institute for Carbon Neutrality, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, 518055, China. linm@sustech.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7785-749X
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 52376191
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Nanobubble-infused electrolytes for enhanced mass transfer in liquid-fed CO · full record | OpenQuestion