Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826267›Full record

ArticleCommunications psychology2025

Neural correlates reveal separate stages of spontaneous face perception.

Amanda K Robinson, Greta Stuart, Sophia M Shatek, Adrian Herbert, Jessica Taubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amanda K RobinsonSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. amanda.robinson@uqconnect.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7378-2803
Greta StuartSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sophia M ShatekSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Adrian HerbertSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1729-0928
Jessica TaubertSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6519-8068

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human brain rapidly detects faces, even in inanimate objects-a phenomenon known as face pareidolia. While this illusion reveals the automaticity of face detection, it also presents a paradox: how does the brain process stimuli that are simultaneously faces and objects? Here, we combined behavioral experiments with electroencephalography to track the temporal dynamics of face pareidolia processing. Using a large stimulus set of human faces, objects containing illusory faces, and matched control objects, we show that perception of face pareidolia is remarkably flexible and task dependent. When making spontaneous similarity judgments, participants (N = 338) perceived illusory faces as intermediate between faces and objects. However, in explicit categorization tasks (N = 22), the same stimuli were predominantly classified as objects, while rating face-likeness (N = 20) bolstered the representation of face-like features. Neural responses (N = 20) tracked this perceptual flexibility: early visual processing (90-130 ms) correlated with face-like judgments, while later activity (150-210 ms) aligned with object categorization. This temporal progression demonstrates how the brain maintains multiple levels of representation, integrating early face detection with subsequent object recognition to support flexible behavior. Our findings demonstrate that face pareidolia exemplifies the brain's capacity to resolve perceptual ambiguity through dynamic processing, with task demands determining how competing representations contribute to perception.

Identifiers

PMID40826267
PMCPMC12361498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.