ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
Factors Affecting Hormonal Therapy Ineffectiveness and Discontinuation due to Adverse Effects in Patients with Endometriosis-Associated Pain.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Impact of combined oral contraceptives and progestin-only pills on psychological and sexual well-being of women with endometriosis: A systematic review.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Pooled it
- Simvastatin and Primaquine Identified as Potential Endometriosis Therapeutics via a Novel Epithelial-Stromal Assembloid Drug Screening Assay.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Superficial Peritoneal Endometriosis Beyond Surgical Diagnosis: A Narrative Review of Emerging Functional and Molecular Perspectives.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Endometriosis contributes to 5-21% of hospital admissions for pelvic pain. While hormonal therapies are pivotal in managing endometriosis-related pain, no single hormonal treatment suits all patients. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of hormonal therapies and factors influencing response in endometriosis-associated pain treatment. Additionally, to investigate adjuvant neuromodulatory drug usage in patients who have used hormonal therapy. This cross-sectional study examined endometriosis patients undergoing hormonal therapy for pelvic pain at a tertiary referral centre for endometriosis and chronic pelvic pain (CPP). We assessed the proportion of patients reporting ineffectiveness of hormonal therapy and rates of discontinuation attributed to side effects. We evaluated factors related to treatment ineffectiveness and discontinuation due to side effects. Lastly, we determined the rates of adjuvant neuromodulatory drug use among patients who used hormonal therapy. 1011 patients were included in the study. Most hormonal therapies' ineffectiveness was related to worse CPP (P < .05). Cul-de-sac obliteration was correlated with better response to cyclic CHCs, DNG, and GnRH agonist (OR = 0.55, 95% CI [0.36 - 0.84]; OR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.29 - 0.98]; OR = 0.26, 95% CI [0.14 - 0.91], respectively). Adjuvant neuromodulatory drugs were more frequently utilized by patients who found hormone therapy ineffective except for those who used norethisterone acetate (NETA). Endometriosis pain is associated with a high chance of failed hormonal therapy. Cul-de-sac obliteration correlated with improved hormonal therapy response, highlighting the multifactorial influence on treatment outcomes. Patients who found hormone therapy ineffective tended to use adjuvant neuromodulatory drugs more frequently.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40826213What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.