ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2025
Advancing deep learning-based segmentation for multiple lung cancer lesions in real-world multicenter CT scans.
Article in European radiology experimental, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Tumor Characterization and Histological Subtype Classification in Lung Cancer Using CT Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Radiomic Assessment of Epicardial Adipose Tissue for the Prediction of Non-Calcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaques.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Letter to the Editor: Advancing deep learning-based segmentation for multiple lung cancer lesions in real-world multicenter CT scans.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Reply to the letter to the Editor: Advancing deep learning-based segmentation for multiple lung cancer lesions in real-world multicenter CT scans.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate segmentation of lung cancer lesions in computed tomography (CT) is essential for precise diagnosis, personalized therapy planning, and treatment response assessment. While automatic segmentation of the primary lung lesion has been widely studied, the ability to segment multiple lesions per patient remains underexplored. In this study, we address this gap by introducing a novel, automated approach for multi-instance segmentation of lung cancer lesions, leveraging a heterogeneous cohort with real-world multicenter data. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe analyzed 1,081 retrospectively collected CT scans with 5,322 annotated lesions (4.92 ± 13.05 lesions per scan). The cohort was stratified into training (n = 868) and testing (n = 213) subsets. We developed an automated three-step pipeline, including thoracic bounding box extraction, multi-instance lesion segmentation, and false positive reduction via a novel multiscale cascade classifier to filter spurious and non-lesion candidates.
resultsOn the independent test set, our method achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 76% for segmentation and a lesion detection sensitivity of 85%. When evaluated on an external dataset of 188 real-world cases, it achieved a Dice similarity coefficient of 73%, and a lesion detection sensitivity of 85%.
conclusionOur approach accurately detected and segmented multiple lung cancer lesions per patient on CT scans, demonstrating robustness across an independent test set and an external real-world dataset. RELEVANCE STATEMENT: AI-driven segmentation comprehensively captures lesion burden, enhancing lung cancer assessment and disease monitoring KEY POINTS: Automatic multi-instance lung cancer lesion segmentation is underexplored yet crucial for disease assessment. Developed a deep learning-based segmentation pipeline trained on multi-center real-world data, which reached 85% sensitivity at external validation. Thoracic bounding box and false positive reduction techniques improved the pipeline's segmentation performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.