Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826202›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Automated machine learning for classification and regression: A tutorial for psychologists.

Chaewon Lee, Kathleen M Gates

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chaewon LeeDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, L.L.Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. chaewon.lee@unc.edu.
Kathleen M GatesDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, L.L.Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 235 E. Cameron Avenue, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has extended the scope of psychological research by enabling data-driven discovery of patterns in complex datasets, complementing traditional hypothesis-driven approaches and enriching individual-level prediction. As a principal subfield, supervised ML has advanced mental health diagnostics and behavior prediction through classification and regression tasks. However, the complexity of ML methodologies and the absence of established norms and standardized pipelines often limit its adoption among psychologists. Furthermore, the black-box nature of advanced ML algorithms obscures how decisions are made, making it difficult to identify the most influential variables. Automated ML (AutoML) addresses these challenges by automating key steps such as model selection and hyperparameter optimization, while enhancing interpretability through explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). By streamlining workflows and improving efficiency, AutoML empowers users of all technical levels to implement advanced ML methods effectively. Despite its transformative potential, AutoML remains underutilized in psychological research, with no dedicated educational material available. This tutorial aims to bridge the gap by introducing AutoML to psychologists. We cover advanced AutoML methods, including combined algorithm selection and hyperparameter optimization (CASH), stacked ensemble generalization, and XAI. The utility of AutoML is demonstrated using the "H2O AutoML" R package with publicly available psychological datasets, performing regression on multi-individual cross-sectional data and classification on single-individual time-series data. We also provide practical workarounds for ML methods not currently supported in the package, so researchers can adopt alternative solutions when needed. These examples illustrate how AutoML democratizes ML, making it more accessible while providing advanced methodologies for psychological research.

Indexed as

Machine LearningPsychologyAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansPsychologistsAutomated machine learningCASHH2O AutoMLMeta-learningStacked ensemble generalizationXAI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.