ArticleGenome medicine2025
Improving automated deep phenotyping through large language models using retrieval-augmented generation.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benchmarking commercial large language models for gene-disease-phenotype extraction from full-text human genetics literature.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Diseases: Opportunities for a Data-Scarce Field.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- ELISA (Embedding-Linked Interactive Single-cell Agent): an interpretable hybrid generative Artificial Intelligence agent for expression-grounded discovery in single-cell genomics.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- OntoCodex: a multi-agent biomedical ontology enrichment framework.npj health systems · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Translating Multimodal Phenotype Documentations into Executable EHR Phenotyping Algorithms.Research square · 2026Article
- Extraction of Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) Concepts from Clinical Notes Utilizing Large Language Models (LLM) with Model Context Protocol (MCP).medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluating Large Language Models for Translating Multimodal Phenotype Documentations into Executable EHR Phenotyping Algorithms.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Automated phenotyping of ophthalmologic diseases from routine medical records using small language models and the human phenotype ontology (HPO).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Phecoder: semantic retrieval for auditing and expanding ICD-based phenotypes in EHR biobanks.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence agents for biological research: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Application of knowledge graphs in rare disease research.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- GREGoR: accelerating genomics for rare diseases.Nature · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Care Quality for Atrial Fibrillation Across Non-Interoperable Electronic Health Record Data using a Retrieval-Augmented Generation-enabled Large Language Model.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Domain specific phenotypic expansion associated with variants inmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- GREGoR: Accelerating Genomics for Rare Diseases.ArXiv · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiagnosing rare genetic disorders relies on precise phenotypic and genotypic analysis, with the Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) providing a standardized language for capturing clinical phenotypes. Rule-based HPO extraction tools use concept recognition to automatically identify phenotypes, but they often struggle with incomplete phenotype assignment, requiring significant manual review. While large language models (LLMs) hold promise for more context-driven phenotype extraction, they are prone to errors and "hallucinations," making them less reliable without further refinement. We present RAG-HPO, a Python-based tool that leverages retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to elevate accuracy of HPO term assignment by LLM. This approach bypasses the limitations of baseline models and eliminates the need for time- and resource-intensive fine-tuning. RAG-HPO integrates a dynamic vector database, containing > 54,000 phenotypic phrases mapped to HPO IDs, which allows real-time retrieval and contextual matching. The RAG-HPO workflow begins by extracting phenotypic phrases from clinical text via an LLM and then matching them via semantic similarity to entries within the database. The best term matches are returned to the LLM as context for final HPO term assignment of each phrase.
resultsPerformance was benchmarked on 112 published case reports with 1792 manually assigned HPO terms and compared to Doc2HPO, ClinPhen, and FastHPOCR. In evaluations, RAG-HPO + LLaMa-3.1 70B achieved a mean precision of 0.81, recall of 0.76, and an F1 score of 0.78-significantly surpassing conventional tools (p < 0.00001). RAG-HPO returned 1648 terms, of which 19.1% (315) were false positives that did not exactly match our manually annotated standard. Among these, < 1% (1/315) represented hallucinations, and 1.3% (4/315) represented terms with no ontological relationship to the desired target; the remaining false positives (95.2%, 300/315) were broader ancestor terms of the target term, which may still be relevant to users in many contexts.
conclusionsRAG-HPO is a user-friendly, adaptable tool designed for secure evaluation of clinical text and outperforms standard HPO-matching tools in precision, recall, and F1. Its enhanced precision and recall represent a substantial advancement in phenotypic analysis, accelerating the identification of genetic mechanisms underlying rare diseases and driving progress in genetic research and clinical genomics. RAG-HPO is available at https://github.com/PoseyPod/RAG-HPO .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.