Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826105›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2025

Weathering the virtual storm: state boredom and coping strategies of novice and experienced Iranian EFL teachers in online learning.

Masoomeh Estaji, Seyedeh Azadeh Sadr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Masoomeh EstajiDepartment of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Persian Literature and Foreign Languages, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran. mestaji74@gmail.com.
Seyedeh Azadeh SadrDepartment of English Language and Literature, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotions are an integral part of the classrooms, where learners and teachers constantly interact. Boredom, a negative academic emotion, adversely affects learning processes and achievement. As a result of its importance and essential role in EFL contexts, this area of inquiry has been the focus of academic research and critical examination. However, few studies (if any) have focused on EFL teachers’ coping strategies to ward off state boredom in online learning, considering their experience level. To fill this gap, the current study investigated the coping strategies of 237 novice and experienced Iranian EFL teachers with different experiences in online teaching contexts through the Coping with Boredom Scale (CBS) Questionnaire [1]. Besides, the authors delivered an open-ended questionnaire to 30 EFL teachers and conducted a semi-structured interview with 16 EFL teachers from the same sample. The results of the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U-Tests analysis indicated that novice and experienced teachers significantly differed in boredom coping strategies (p = .002) in that experienced teachers utilized a more comprehensive range of coping strategies to deal with their state boredom. The results of MAXQDA also evidenced that although there were some similarities in the utilized strategies across both groups, experienced teachers’ strategies were affected by their teaching experience, leading them to apply cognitive-avoidance strategies, like altering lesson plans and content, more frequently than novice teachers. The study presents practical implications for EFL teachers and researchers, stressing the role of teachers’ experiences in coping with boredom.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalBoredomCoping SkillsEducation, DistanceLearningSchool TeachersAdultFemaleHumansIranMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCoping strategiesEFL teachersExperienced teachersNovice teachersOnline teachingState boredomTeaching experience

Identifiers

PMID40826105
PMCPMC12359936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.