ArticleBMC medical education2025
Evaluating faculty and trainee perceptions on entrustable professional activities in dental postgraduate training: a cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Video-enhanced training for entrustable professional activities in preclinical oral surgery: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEntrustable Professional Activities are essential, observable tasks that postgraduate trainees can perform independently upon demonstrating competence. EPAs provide a structured framework for competency-based education, bridging theoretical knowledge and practical application. This study aimed to evaluate the perceptions, awareness, and challenges of EPA implementation among faculty and trainees in postgraduate dental programs.
methodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 100 faculty members and 300 trainees from various dental institutions. Structured questionnaires assessed demographic data, awareness, usage, and satisfaction with EPAs. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 26, employing Chi-square test to evaluate relationships, with a significant threshold of p < 0.05.
resultsA majority of faculty (63%) emphasized the necessity of prior training for effective EPA implementation, while 39% reported logistical challenges. Only 28% strongly agreed that sufficient institutional support was available. Among trainees, 34% strongly agreed on the importance of EPAs for competency development, and 50.7% expressed satisfaction with their integration. However, 35% reported performance anxiety under observation. Thematic analysis revealed variability in feedback adequacy and stress associated with direct supervision.
conclusionsEPAs hold significant potential for improving CBE in postgraduate dental education. Effective implementation requires addressing resource constraints, enhancing faculty training, and fostering supportive environments for trainees. Institutional alignment with curricular goals and systematic feedback mechanisms are critical for success. Integrating EPAs into postgraduate dental curricula can enhance training outcomes by providing a structured approach to competency assessment. Addressing implementation barriers will ensure post-graduates are prepared for independent clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.