ArticleBMC health services research2025
Implementing nature walking groups in mental health services as a transdiagnostic approach to promote recovery: a study protocol for a non-randomised trial.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAustralia is currently facing substantial challenges due to the increasing prevalence of mental health disorders, which pose significant burden on the healthcare system. Nature-based interventions such as Nature Walking Groups (NWGs) have been identified as effective interventions for improving mental health outcomes. However, they are rarely provided in Australian mental health services. Therefore, the implementation and evaluation of NWGs within mental health services in Australia is required.
methodThis research will employ a mixed-method design based on the RE-AIM framework to assess the impact of NWGs on mental health. The study will be conducted in two Australian mental health services: in Orange and Wollongong, both located in New South Wales. Three groups of participants will be recruited: (1) walking group, or intervention (n = 40), (2) non-walking group, or control (n = 40), and (3) NWG facilitators (n = 10). A total of four NWGs over 12 months will be conducted in the two sites by the trained NWG facilitators. Intervention participants will participate in one NWG, receiving 1 h per week in nature for a continuous period of 12 weeks (twelve walks per participant), while still also receiving treatment as usual (TAU). On each walk, facilitators will draw participant attention to one of the natural features and guide participants through stress reduction and mindfulness activities, lasting 3 to 10 min in duration. The control group will continue to receive TAU. Data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention, and at a 3-month follow-up, including salivary cortisol and Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) tests. Ethnographic observations, semi-structured interviews, and member-checking post analysis will be employed. DISCUSSION: NWGs could open a new horizon in improving mental health outcomes, however, the impact and the benefits of a NWG specific to the community mental health setting is limited in Australian context. This trial will investigate the implementation and impact of walking and engaging with nature for participating consumers in two Australian community mental health services which will inform healthcare delivery.
trial registrationAustralia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry (ANZCTR) registration number: ACTRN12624000733572, 14 June, 2024 with protocol V.2. The ANZCTR adheres to all items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.