ArticleBMC public health2025
Breaking barriers: a qualitative study on polio vaccine hesitancy in Herat Province, Afghanistan.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPolio vaccination faces persistent challenges in Afghanistan due to socio-cultural barriers, distrust in healthcare systems, and ongoing conflicts, making it crucial to address vaccine hesitancy for successful eradication efforts.. Therefore, this study was designed to explain the reasons for families in Herat Province, Afghanistan, not receiving the polio vaccine. METHODOLOGY: This qualitative study was conducted in 2023 in Herat Province, Afghanistan. In this study, 22 families who refused vaccination were interviewed until data saturation was achieved. To ensure representativeness, participants were purposefully selected to capture demographic diversity in age, economic status, educational background, number of children, and occupation, providing a comprehensive view of factors influencing vaccine hesitancy across different segments of the population Data analysis was conducted using MAXQDA 2022 software with conventional content analysis.
resultsParticipants ranged from 25 to50 years old, most had less than high school education, and many were self-employed. Main themes from the data included: stereotypical beliefs, cultural barriers, government inadequacies, and vaccine-related concerns, with nine subcategories.
conclusionTo enhance vaccine acceptance, community-based communication strategies involving trusted local leaders, such as religious and tribal figures, could be instrumental in building public trust. Campaigns tailored to address specific misconceptions-using simple language and culturally sensitive approaches-would likely resonate more with hesitant populations. Additionally, establishing transparent channels for reporting vaccine safety and efficacy may help to dispel myths and increase confidence in immunization programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.