Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40826041›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2025

Radiotherapy quality assurance program of ongoing clinical trial using stereotactic ablative radiation therapy for recurrent ovarian cancer (SABR-ROC): a dummy run study of a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III trial (KGOG 3064/KROG 2204).

Sangjoon Park, Hojin Kim, Chan Woo Wee, Young Seok Kim, Jin Hwa Choi, Yeon Sil Kim, Jong Hoon Lee, Youngmin Choi, Jin Hee Kim, Yeona Cho and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05444270 (Prospective Multi-institutional Phase III Trial of Salvage Systemic Therapy With or Without Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05444270 narecruitingnot on this map

Prospective Multi-institutional Phase III Trial of Salvage Systemic Therapy With or Without Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2022 to 2026Enrolled270ConditionsRecurrent Epithelial Ovarian CancerArmsStandard salvage therapy, Standard salvage therapy + SABR
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Sangjoon ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Hojin KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Chan Woo WeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea.
Young Seok KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Hwa ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yeon Sil KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong Hoon LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, St. Vincent's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Youngmin ChoiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Dong-A University, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Jin Hee KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Yeona ChoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Ju KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Young Je ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Keun-Yong EomDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Yun Hwan KimDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong Bae KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 03722, Republic of Korea. ybkim3@yuhs.ac.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HA22C0021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrent ovarian cancer is often treated with chemotherapy, but many patients experience multiple recurrences with progressively shorter intervals and poorer prognosis. Repeated chemotherapy reduces patients' quality of life. Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer (SABR-ROC) (KGOG3064/KROG 2204) is an ongoing trial investigating the clinical efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiation therapy (SABR) for recurrent ovarian cancer. This study aimed to assess treatment planning consistency and protocol adherence in a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III trial.

methodsIn this dummy run study of a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase III trial (SABR-ROC), we examined the variability in target delineation, dose prescription, and treatment planning among 10 centers participating in the SABR-ROC trial. Four representative cases, each presenting with different anatomical sites and treatment challenges, were selected for evaluation. Target volume consistency was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient, and treatment plans were reviewed to follow predefined goals and constraints in the protocol.

resultsOverall agreement in target delineation was low, with mean Dice similarity coefficients of 0.278 and 0.255 for gross tumor volume and planning target volume, respectively. Consistency was higher for cases involving lymph node and lung metastases but significantly lower for intraperitoneal and liver seeding metastases due to challenges in target delineation. Treatment plans generally adhered to protocol dose prescriptions, with minor deviations in planning target volume coverage, particularly in cases with multiple small metastases. Deviations from organ-at-risk constraints frequently occurred in cases involving small bowel proximity.

conclusionsThis study highlights the challenges in standardizing SABR for recurrent ovarian cancer, particularly in achieving a consensus on target delineation and balancing treatment efficacy with organ-at-risk safety. Clinician discretion remains essential in complex cases. The insights from this study will guide the development of standardized protocols to improve outcomes and reduce adverse effects in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

trial registrationThis trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT05444270 on June 29, 2022.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiosurgeryAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedDummy-RunQuality assuranceRadiation therapy planningRecurrent ovarian CancerStereotactic ablative radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID40826041
PMCPMC12362936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.