ArticleBMC gastroenterology2025
Animal study of adhesiolysis via transumbilical endoscopic surgery with gastric endoscopy: an exploration.
Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of peritoneal dialysis catheter placement techniques on dialysate leakage characteristics in a beagle model.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
- Feasibility of embryonic-natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for submucosal tumors with mucosal preservation in beagle model.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsAdhesive intestinal obstruction is a common clinical condition caused by obstruction of the intestinal contents. Adhesiolysis is an effective treatment, but traditional open or laparoscopic adhesiolysis is traumatic and often causes a recurrence of adhesions. In this study, we investigate the feasibility and safety of adhesiolysis via transumbilical endoscopic surgery (TUES) with a gastric endoscopy.
methodsEight beagles were used to establish a model of adhesive intestinal obstruction through open simulated surgery. TUES adhesiolysis with a gastric endoscopy was performed 2 weeks later. The time of adhesiolysis, vital signs of beagles, intraoperative hemorrhage, intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Three months later, the abdominal cavity was re-explored to observe whether there were recurrences of adhesions, abdominal infections, and other complications.
resultsThe modeling of all 8 beagles was successfully achieved in the formation of adhesive intestinal obstruction, and the TUES adhesiolysis was successfully completed. The median (interquartile range) time of adhesiolysis was 83(9) minutes. The vital signs of the beagles were stable, and there were no adverse events, including heavy bleeding, perforation, or mortality during the operation. All 8 beagles survived without postoperative complications such as delayed bleeding, peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscess, and abdominal wall incisional hernia three months after adhesiolysis.
conclusionTUES adhesiolysis has been preliminarily proven to be minimally invasive, safe, and effective, which provides a new option for adhesive intestinal obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.