ArticleBMC primary care2025
Obesity care knowledge and practice among primary care physicians in Klang valley: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObesity has become a public health concern as its prevalence has increased rapidly around the world, including Malaysia. Primary care physicians (PCPs) are the first point of contact for obese patients, playing a crucial role in managing obesity. This study aims to determine the level of obesity care knowledge and practices among PCPs and to identify factors associated with them.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted using a self-administered questionnaire distributed physically and online to PCPs. Pearson Chi-Square test was used to identify associations between demographic characteristics and obesity-related knowledge while the relationship between knowledge and practice scores was explored using regression analysis.
resultsA total of 126 PCPs participated in the study. Of these, 72% demonstrated a good level of knowledge, and 66% showed good practices in obesity care. Use of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was significantly associated with higher knowledge scores, while both CPG use and prior training were significantly associated with better practice scores (p < 0.05). A moderate positive correlation was observed between knowledge and practice scores (r = 0.397, p < 0.001).
conclusionPCPs have good obesity care knowledge and practice. Those using CPGs and with training were better prepared, resulting in improved practices. Enhancing awareness of these factors is crucial for future knowledge and practice improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.