Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825963›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The psychometric network of individual flourishing across nationally representative samples from 22 countries.

Michela Zambelli, Dwight C K Tse, Richard G Cowden, Jan Höltge, Byron R Johnson, R Noah Padgett, Tyler J VanderWeele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michela ZambelliUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Dwight C K TseUniversity of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland, UK. dwight.tse@strath.ac.uk.
Richard G CowdenHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jan HöltgeDalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Byron R JohnsonBaylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
R Noah PadgettHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tyler J VanderWeeleHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Funding

Fetzer Institute 4354John Templeton Foundation 61665Templeton Religion Trust 1308TWCF 0605
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To effectively promote human flourishing, it is important to understand how the different dimensions of flourishing might be related to one another in different sociocultural contexts. Applying a systems perspective to flourishing, this study uses nationally representative survey cross-sectional data from 22 geographically and culturally diverse countries included in the Global Flourishing Study (N = 202,898) to explore the interrelatedness of the components of individual flourishing captured by the Secure Flourish Measure. A meta-analytic gaussian network aggregation (MAGNA) model was applied to investigate similarities and differences among the interrelations of individual flourishing components across countries. Results revealed a network of mostly positive interrelations among the 12 components, although there was substantial heterogeneity in the strength of associations, especially between life satisfaction, happiness, and mental health. Understanding cross-country differences in light of socio-contextual peculiarities will be crucial for informing the development of targeted interventions to promote flourishing.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPsychometricsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHappinessHumansMaleMiddle AgedPersonal SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesCross-countryGlobal flourishing studyMeta-analytic gaussian network aggregationPsychometric network analysis

Identifiers

PMID40825963
PMCPMC12361562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.