ArticleScientific reports2025
Brucella abortus interferes with the inflammatory response and tissue repair in mice.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Desipramine treatment disrupts phagocytic and intracellular survival ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- [Analysis of factors affecting fibrosis reversal in patients with metabolic associated steatohepatitis based on magnetic resonance elastography].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brucellosis caused by Brucella spp. is considered a debilitating chronic zoonotic disease. B. abortus, which is endemic in many countries, is responsible for chronic bovine and human infections. Interestingly, there are joint and breast implant infections caused by Brucella spp. Although Brucella spp. induce an insidious inflammatory response, little is known about the influence of bacteria on the establishment of early inflammation in vivo, particularly in a synthetic sponge model. B. abortus 2308 was able to survive and replicate in this model, whereas B. abortus Δ virB2 was attenuated, confirming its inability to cause persistent infection. Compared with Δ virB2, B. abortus 2308 is able to modulate the inflammatory response in sponge. We observed that B. abortus 2308 induced a lower influx of inflammatory cells and inflammatory mediators and the formation of fibrovascular tissue at 14 days postimplantation than the control or ΔvirB2-infected mice. Compared with the uninfected sponge, infection by B. abortus in the sponge prolonged the percentage of Mф and M1 macrophages, in addition to increasing the percentage of CD8 + T lymphocytes. B. abortus 2308 can inhibit inflammation in vivo, and the T4SS influences the course of the acute inflammatory process in a synthetic matrix model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.