Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825954›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Ecological safety evaluation method for plateau characteristic agribusinesses based on knowledge granularity.

Yuan-Wei Du, Yu-Xiang Shang, Chun-Hao Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuan-Wei DuSchool of Business and Tourism Management, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, People's Republic of China. duyuanwei@foxmail.com.
Yu-Xiang ShangSchool of Business and Tourism Management, Yunnan University, Kunming, 650500, People's Republic of China.
Chun-Hao LiSchool of Management, Jilin University, Changchun, 130022, People's Republic of China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72271108National Natural Science Foundation of China 72464035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ecological safety of plateau-characteristic agribusinesses (PCABs) encompasses not only environmental protection during production but also enhancing output without harming the ecosystem. Objectively evaluating PCABs' ecological safety levels is crucial for making management decisions and promoting local sustainable development. However, existing evaluation methods fail to incorporate expert knowledge structures, leading to limitations in both scientific validity and practical applicability. To address this gap, we propose an ecological safety evaluation method based on knowledge granularity, tailored to PCABs. The evaluation process involves the following steps: first, numerous knowledge points across macro-, meso-, and micro-levels are organized, and a hierarchical knowledge structure is designed for experts to freely select. Second, using belief distribution functions, experts provide evaluation information at varying levels of knowledge granularity. Third, expert weights and reliability parameters are determined through entropy and similarity calculations. Subsequently, the generalized combination rule is applied to progressively integrate multilevel knowledge-granularity evaluation information, from bottom to top and from individual to group, producing high-quality group evaluations. Finally, the method is applied to a typical plateau specialty agribusiness; the results indicate that its ecological safety status is "good." On that basis, we make targeted management recommendations.

Indexed as

Ecological safety evaluation methodsGeneralized combination ruleKnowledge granularityKnowledge structuresPlateau-characteristic agribusiness

Identifiers

PMID40825954
PMCPMC12361536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.