Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825924›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2025

Assessing the reliability of an online measure of the temporal binding window of audiovisual integration.

Leon Flanagan, Nina M Zumbrunn, Rebecca J Hirst, David P McGovern

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leon FlanaganSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin Campus, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Nina M ZumbrunnSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin Campus, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Rebecca J HirstSchool of Psychology and Institute of Neuroscience, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland.
David P McGovernSchool of Psychology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin Campus, Dublin 9, Ireland. david.p.mcgovern@dcu.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5748-2827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that imprecise multisensory temporal processing is associated with a range of adverse clinical outcomes. Specifically, this research has shown that the temporal binding window of audiovisual integration widens with advancing age, whereas individuals with various neurodevelopmental disorders exhibit distinctive profiles of multisensory processing when compared to their neurotypical counterparts. While this line of research has made significant inroads in emphasising the importance of multisensory processing in both typical and atypical cognition, the field would greatly benefit from the validation of web-based tools for assessing multisensory temporal processing, enabling larger sample sizes and the recruitment of typically hard-to-reach populations. Here, we assessed the reliability of a web-based version of the sound-induced flash illusion (SIFI) and examined the level of agreement between the measurements of the temporal binding window that it produces relative to those derived from the SIFI task performed under standard laboratory conditions. Our results demonstrate that both versions of the task elicit a robust SIFI effect and show a similar dependency on the stimulus onset asynchronies between the audiovisual stimuli. Furthermore, our analysis revealed strong correlations between the estimated measurements of both the width and peak amplitude of the temporal binding window derived from the online and lab-based task versions, confirming the suitability of the web-based task for assessing multisensory function. Future studies should extend the evaluation of this online implementation of the SIFI to clinical populations who exhibit impaired multisensory temporal processing, to assess its suitability for clinical research.

Indexed as

Auditory PerceptionInternetVisual PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansIllusionsMalePhotic StimulationReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultAudiovisual integrationMultisensory temporal processingSound-induced flash illusionTemporal binding windowWeb-based assessment

Identifiers

PMID40825924
PMCPMC12361292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.