ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Machine learning-based detection of electrosurgical device-induced bleeding in laparoscopic videos of diaphragmatic hernia repair.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI enhanced surgeons' faster responses to intraoperative bleeding in laparoscopic surgery: a preclinical randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- External validation and clinical readiness of intraoperative video AI in general surgery: a systematic review.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Quantifying 3D foot and ankle alignment using an AI-driven framework: a pilot study.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundElectrosurgical devices provide significant advantages for tissue dissection in laparoscopic procedures. However, achieving optimal hemostasis while minimizing tissue coagulation is challenging. Monitoring device-induced bleeding will provide viable information for surgical skills assessment. We aimed to automatically detect bleeding induced by electrosurgical device use in laparoscopic videos using machine learning.
methodsWe present a two-step methodology for the automated detection of device-induced bleeding. First, based on the color representation, a random forest classifier (RFC) detects blood pixels in the frames before and after the electrosurgical device activation. Subsequently, a logistic regression (LR) model decides whether bleeding has occurred based on the change in blood pixels. The moments of device activations during surgery can be extracted automatically by a synchronized recording of the laparoscopic video and energy generator data. The RFC and LR were developed on the manual annotation of 34 images and 2678 video fragments from forty-five patients who underwent diaphragmatic hernia repair between May 2023 and October 2024. The performance of the RFC was evaluated by an 80/20 split for training and testing, while a stratified threefold cross-validation assessed the LR performance.
resultsThe blood pixel detection showed an accuracy of 94% and a Dice score of 0.472. The classification of automatically extracted video fragments showed that device-induced bleeding can be detected with a 78.2% accuracy, 4.6% precision, 78.1% specificity, and 81.0% sensitivity.
conclusionThe presented work on device-induced bleeding detection is a step toward quantifying the effect of electrosurgery use. We showed a machine learning-based methodology that accurately identifies video fragments of device activations without bleeding but struggles to identify bleeding precisely. Future work should focus on developing device-induced bleeding detection in a larger, more diverse dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.