ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Predictors of pre-resection hydrocephalus in posterior cranial fossa tumors: development of a predictive scoring model.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Critical Appraisal of "Management of hydrocephalus associated with posterior fossa tumors in adults: results of a prospective study".Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain tumors located in the posterior cranial fossa frequently lead to hydrocephalus. However, few investigations have delineated factors predicting preoperative hydrocephalus. This study aimed to identify risk factors for hydrocephalus prior to tumor resection in the posterior cranial fossa and to develop a predictive scoring model. We reviewed 421 patients with posterior cranial fossa tumors, stratifying them into groups with (n = 160, 38%) and without (n = 261, 62%) hydrocephalus on initial neuroimaging. Demographic, radiographic, and craniometric variables were collected. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed, and odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were determined. Factors that remained significant in the multivariable model were incorporated into a novel scoring system. Multiple factors were associated with preoperative hydrocephalus in univariate analysis. In the final multivariable model, increased intracranial pressure, ataxia, cognitive impairment, large tumor volume, and peritumoral vasogenic edema showed strong correlations with hydrocephalus. Pre-resection hydrocephalus in patients with posterior cranial fossa tumors was strongly associated with clinical symptoms (increased intracranial pressure, ataxia, and cognitive impairment) and radiographic findings (large tumor volume and peritumoral vasogenic edema). These results may guide early surveillance and facilitate surgical prioritization to avert severe complications in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.