Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825882›Full record

ArticleCell research2025

AlphaCD: a machine learning model capable of highly accurate characterization for 21,335 cytidine deaminases.

Kui Xu, Guoying Hua, Mingdi Wu, Haihang Zhang, Jingda Liu, Hu Feng, Erwei Zuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kui Xu *State Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Gene Editing Technologies (Hainan), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Guoying Hua *State Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Gene Editing Technologies (Hainan), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Mingdi Wu *State Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Gene Editing Technologies (Hainan), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Haihang Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Gene Editing Technologies (Hainan), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Jingda LiuState Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Gene Editing Technologies (Hainan), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Hu FengState Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Gene Editing Technologies (Hainan), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Erwei ZuoState Key Laboratory of Genome and Multi-omics Technologies, Shenzhen Branch, Guangdong Laboratory of Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Key Laboratory of Gene Editing Technologies (Hainan), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Agricultural Genomics Institute at Shenzhen, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China. zuoerwei@caas.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-8259-0275

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vast scope but limited-supporting evidence in sequence databases hinders identification of proteins with specific functionality. Here, we experimentally characterized catalytic efficiency, target site window, motif preference, and off-target activity of 1100 apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme, catalytic polypeptide (APOBEC)-like family cytidine deaminases (CDs) fused with nCas9 in HEK293T cells, thereby generating the largest dataset of experimentally validated functions for a single protein family to date. These data, together with amino acid sequence, three-dimensional structure, and eight additional features, were used to construct a machine learning (ML) model, AlphaCD, which showed high accuracy in predicting catalytic efficiency (0.92) and off-target activity (0.84), as well as target windows (0.73) and catalytic motifs (0.78). We applied the trained model to predict the above catalytic features of 21,335 CDs in Uniprot, and subsampling of 28 CDs further validated its prediction accuracy (0.84, 0.87, 0.75, 0.73, respectively). Alanine scanning-based mutagenesis was then employed to reduce off-targets in one example CD, which produced a remarkably high fidelity, high efficiency cytosine base editor, thus demonstrating AlphaCD application in high-accuracy, high-throughput protein functional characterization, and providing a strategy for accelerated characterization of other proteins.

Indexed as

Cytidine DeaminaseMachine LearningAmino Acid SequenceHEK293 CellsHumansCytidine Deaminase

Identifiers

PMID40825882
PMCPMC12484669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.