ArticleCommunications psychology2025
Auditory-motor adaptation and de-adaptation for speech depend more on time in the new environment than on the amount of practice.
Article in Communications psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Individuals with aphasia generate larger adaptive and corrective responses to suddenly introduced auditory perturbations.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sensorimotor adaptation is critical for learning and refining voluntary movements. One common assumption is that the number of practice trials fully determines the amount of adaptation. It is possible, however, that for some tasks the sensorimotor system continues to learn during the time in-between executed movements as long as there is no evidence that the environment has changed. The amount of time spent in the altered environment (total exposure time) then would be more important than the number of practice movements performed during that time. In the current study, we investigated adaptation and de-adaptation as a function of practice trials versus exposure time using speech articulation as the model system. Four separate groups of 14 participants read out loud monosyllabic words at a rate of either 18 words per minute or only 6 words per minute during the adaptation and de-adaptation phases of a speaking task with formant-shifted auditory feedback. The data demonstrate that both auditory-motor adaptation and de-adaptation depend more on exposure time than amount of practice. COIN model simulations suggest that this common effect is consistent with de-adaptation constituting active re-learning of the unaltered environment rather than forgetting of the learned behavior.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.