ArticleScientific reports2025
Occupational noise annoyance and sensitivity as potential contributors to oxidative stress in metal industry workers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Noise is recognized as a psychological stressor that led to noise annoyance, and individual noise sensitivity could play a moderating role. This study aimed to investigate the association between noise annoyance, noise sensitivity, and oxidative stress responses among workers in metal manufacturing industries. A total of 161 workers participated in the study. Demographic data and noise sensitivity were assessed using the Weinstein Noise Sensitivity Scale, while noise annoyance was evaluated via the ISO/TS 15666:2003 questionnaire. Daily noise exposure was measured using a sound level meter. Serum levels of oxidative stress biomarkers, including Malondialdehyde (MDA), Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC), and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), were determined using ZellBio diagnostic kits. Statistical analyses were performed in SPSS v.18, with a significance threshold of 0.05. The mean equivalent noise level was 80.11 ± 11.3 dBA. Among participants, 80.1% reported some degree of noise annoyance, and 74% reported noise sensitivity. No significant association was observed between demographic variables and oxidative stress markers, nor between noise sensitivity or annoyance and induction of oxidative stress. These findings suggest that, under current exposure conditions, subjective reactions to noise, such as annoyance and sensitivity, may not significantly influence oxidative stress, highlighting the need for further investigation into other modulating factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.