ArticleScientific reports2025
Application of nano-pico geotechnics and nano-pico heritage spray techniques for restoring and protecting historical brick buildings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluates nanotechnology's application in restoring historical brick facades, specifically focusing on how montmorillonite clay nanoparticle spray effectively fills cracks and pores, thereby reducing porosity and decreasing water absorption. The research methodology involves controlled experiments on both historical and purchased brick samples, assessing the impact of nanospray through water absorption and porosity tests. The study seeks to mitigate surface water penetration to the bricks, as well as to fill the capillary cracks and pores that have formed due to various factors. Results indicate that nanospray successfully fills pores and capillary cracks, reducing water penetration and improving brick durability. When nanoparticles fill these pores and cracks, they effectively reduce the overall porosity and also increase the tortuosity that water vapor must take to pass through the material. By reducing the number and size of pores and making the diffusion path more tortuous, the nanoparticle treatment can increase the water vapor diffusion resistance of the brick. While reducing water absorption is beneficial for protecting the brick from water damages, breadthening of historic masonry is necessary, meaning it must be able to absorb or release moisture by changing the humidity level. Using nanoclays as Nano-Pico Getechnics (NaPG) and Nano-Geotechnics (NaG) techniques can consider the balance between reducing water absorption and maintaining sufficient vapor permeability (breathability). clay nanoparticles can fill the pores without completely blocking them, thus allowing vapor to pass through. This study contributes to advancing sustainable restoration practices to assess the long-term effects and environmental adaptability of nanospray applications. This nanotechnology approach is chosen not only for its high efficiency in protecting brick facades but also for its economic viability and environmental compatibility, classifying it as a form of "green restoration" or "sustainable restoration".
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.