ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparing soil microbial diversity in smallholder plantain backyard gardens and main farms in Western and Central Africa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), plantains (Musa spp.) are a staple crop and a vital source of income for smallholder farmers. Despite their importance, the microbial diversity of soils in plantain-growing agroecologies remains poorly understood-particularly how it may influence plant performance and resilience through soil-plant interactions. In this study, we used Illumina MiSeq-based 16S rDNA sequencing to characterize bacterial communities in the rhizosphere of plantains cultivated under two distinct agroecological settings: Backyard gardens and main farms. Analyses of alpha and beta diversity (Sobs, Chao1, ACE, Shannon-Wiener, and Simpson indices; P < 0.05) revealed significant differences in species richness and community structure between the two agroecologies. Actinobacteria (55%) emerged as the dominant phylum, followed by Proteobacteria (21%) and Acidobacteria (15%). Beneficial genera such as Bacillus, Streptomyces, Bradyrhizobium, and Paenibacillus were also detected. Functional predictions based on COG and KEGG databases indicated notable differences in microbial functional potential between the two settings. These results suggest that agroecological context and habitat type strongly influence rhizosphere microbial diversity, with important implications for enhancing plant-microbe interactions and supporting crop resilience in SSA's resource-limited smallholder systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.