Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825539›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2025

Challenges and Opportunities of the Human-Centered Design Approach: Case Study Development of an Assistive Device for the Navigation of Persons With Visual Impairment.

Mario Andres Chavarria, Luisa María Ortiz-Escobar, Bladimir Bacca-Cortes, Victor Romero-Cano, Isabella Villota, Jhon Kevin Muñoz Peña, José Roberto Londoño Sánchez, Oscar Campo, Silvan Suter, Jhon Jairo Cabrera-López and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Mario Andres Chavarria *EssentialTech Centre, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3112-0489
Luisa María Ortiz-Escobar *Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería Biomédica, GBIO, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1701-7058
Bladimir Bacca-Cortes *School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0113-4134
Victor Romero-Cano *School of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2910-5116
Isabella Villota *Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería Biomédica, GBIO, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7753-3079
Jhon Kevin Muñoz Peña *School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4280-6358
José Roberto Londoño Sánchez *Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería Biomédica, GBIO, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2426-0201
Oscar Campo *Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería Biomédica, GBIO, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5007-9613
Silvan Suter *EssentialTech Centre, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1960-079X
Jhon Jairo Cabrera-López *Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería Biomédica, GBIO, Universidad Autónoma de Occidente, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2608-755X
Maria Fernanda Sanchez Patiño *Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5232-0635
Eduardo Francisco Caicedo-Bravo *School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0727-2917
Michael Stein *Harvard Law School Project on Disability, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9564-7461
Samia Hurst *Institute of Ethics, History, and Humanities, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1980-5226
Klaus Schönenberger *EssentialTech Centre, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4477-8909
Minerva Rivas Velarde *Geneva School of Health Science, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-3306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVisual impairment (VI) significantly impacts quality of life, particularly in autonomous pedestrian navigation. Limitations in independent navigation lead to frustration, diminished confidence, and risks to bodily integrity for individuals with VI. In Colombia, the pilot country of this study, approximately 2 million people live with some form of visual disability. Globally, only 1 in 10 people requiring assistive devices have access to them, with factors such as deficient product design stemming from limited knowledge of user expectations, local needs, and environmental constraints, posing significant challenges, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the feasibility and limitations of applying the human-centered design (HCD) principles outlined by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-210:2019 standard in assistive technology (AT) development for individuals with VI in Colombia.

methodsWe developed a prototype navigation device using the HCD principles, emphasizing a thorough analysis of user needs and environmental contexts. The project leveraged multidisciplinary collaboration to address challenges associated with user engagement and design adaptability while managing legal and bureaucratic constraints. The navigation system integrates artificial intelligence algorithms, specifically developed by the research team as part of this work, to enhance its adaptability and responsiveness to diverse environments. The development process featured iterative prototyping cycles, incorporating user feedback at each stage, all within the boundaries of applicable regulatory frameworks.

resultsThe development and evaluation of the initial prototype highlighted both the feasibility and key limitations of applying the ISO 9241-210:2019 HCD principles in AT for individuals with VI in the Colombian context. The prototype met several user-defined expectations by prioritizing affordability; extended battery life; autonomy in internet-constrained environments; and improved ergonomics, concealability, aesthetics, and obstacle detection. These achievements demonstrated the potential of HCD to guide context-sensitive innovation. However, the process also revealed significant barriers: limited legal and procedural clarity for engaging users in design phases, difficulties navigating ethics committees, and a lack of practical guidance within the ISO standard itself. These constraints, compounded by challenges in interdisciplinary collaboration, limited the depth and adaptability of user involvement across development stages.

conclusionsImplementing HCD principles in AT development shows promise for creating effective and affordable solutions tailored to user needs and contexts. However, legislative and methodological barriers must be addressed to fully realize HCD's potential. Future efforts should focus on aligning research methodologies with hardware and software development practices while integrating legislative frameworks to enhance the accessibility and effectiveness of AT innovations.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceassistive technologyblindnesscontextdisabilityelectronic travel aidhuman-centered designLMICslow and middle-income countriesnavigationuser-centered designvisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID40825539
PMCPMC12402732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.