ArticleJournal of Yeungnam medical science2025
Predictive assessment with outcomes of phrenic nerve study in Guillain-Barré syndrome: a prospective study.
Article in Journal of Yeungnam medical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGuillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute acquired autoimmune inflammatory disorder of the peripheral nerves and roots. Respiratory insufficiency is an important predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with GBS. Phrenic nerve assessment is an area of interest in GBS with respiratory failure. We aimed to analyze the characteristics of the phrenic nerve conduction study (NCS) in GBS and assess its value in predicting respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support, along with outcome assessment at 6 months as per the Hughes score.
methodsA total of 135 patients with GBS admitted to our hospital over 3 years were thoroughly evaluated by clinical examination, blood laboratory tests, and phrenic NCS.
resultsPhrenic NCS abnormality was observed in 48 patients (35.6%) with statistically significant increases in phrenic sum compound muscle action potential (CMAP) latency (18.91±7.82 ms) and sum CMAP duration (44.65±6.84 ms), along with reduced sum CMAP amplitude (0.3246±0.132 mV) and sum CMAP area (3.56±2.62 mV·ms) occurring in those requiring ventilatory assistance. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and positive and negative likelihood ratios of the phrenic NCS for predicting respiratory failure in patients with GBS were 90.7%, 90.2%, 81.3%, 95.4%, 9.27, and 0.10, respectively. The results showed a statistically significant association between abnormal initial phrenic NCS scores and outcomes at 6 months.
conclusionPhrenic NCS can predict respiratory failure requiring ventilator assistance in patients with GBS. Phrenic NCS can be incorporated into routine NCS protocols to predict impending respiratory failure in patients with GBS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.