ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025
Protein language model pseudolikelihoods capture features of in vivo B cell selection and evolution.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nucleotide context models outperform protein language models for predicting antibody affinity maturation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Nucleotide context models outperform protein language models for predicting antibody affinity maturation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Delineating inter- and intra-antibody repertoire evolution with AntibodyForests.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
B cell selection and evolution play crucial roles in dictating successful immune responses. Recent advancements in sequencing technologies and deep-learning strategies have paved the way for generating and exploiting an ever-growing wealth of antibody repertoire data. The self-supervised nature of protein language models (PLMs) has demonstrated the ability to learn complex representations of antibody sequences and has been leveraged for a wide range of applications including diagnostics, structural modeling, and antigen-specificity predictions. PLM-derived likelihoods have been used to improve antibody affinities in vitro, raising the question of whether PLMs can capture and predict features of B cell selection in vivo. Here, we explore how general and antibody-specific PLM-generated sequence pseudolikelihoods (SPs) relate to features of in vivo B cell selection such as expansion, isotype usage, and somatic hypermutation (SHM) at single-cell resolution. Our results demonstrate that the type of PLM and the region of the antibody input sequence significantly affect the generated SP. Contrary to previous in vitro reports, we observe a negative correlation between SPs and binding affinity, whereas repertoire features such as SHM and isotype usage were strongly correlated with SPs. By constructing evolutionary lineage trees of B cell clones from human and mouse repertoires, we observe that SHMs are routinely among the most likely mutations suggested by PLMs and that mutating residues have lower absolute likelihoods than conserved residues. Our findings highlight the potential of PLMs to predict features of antibody selection and further suggest their potential to assist in antibody discovery and engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.