Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825239›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2025

Protein language model pseudolikelihoods capture features of in vivo B cell selection and evolution.

Daphne van Ginneken, Anamay Samant, Karlis Daga-Krumins, Wiona Glänzer, Andreas Agrafiotis, Evgenios Kladis, Sai T Reddy, Alexander Yermanos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daphne van GinnekenCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht 3584EA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5893-7096
Anamay SamantDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Klingelbergstrasse 48, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Karlis Daga-KruminsCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht 3584EA, The Netherlands.
Wiona GlänzerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Klingelbergstrasse 48, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Andreas AgrafiotisDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Klingelbergstrasse 48, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0797-4695
Evgenios KladisDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Klingelbergstrasse 48, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.
Sai T ReddyDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Klingelbergstrasse 48, 4056 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7038-5319
Alexander YermanosCenter for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Lundlaan 6, Utrecht 3584EA, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6238-0588

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B cell selection and evolution play crucial roles in dictating successful immune responses. Recent advancements in sequencing technologies and deep-learning strategies have paved the way for generating and exploiting an ever-growing wealth of antibody repertoire data. The self-supervised nature of protein language models (PLMs) has demonstrated the ability to learn complex representations of antibody sequences and has been leveraged for a wide range of applications including diagnostics, structural modeling, and antigen-specificity predictions. PLM-derived likelihoods have been used to improve antibody affinities in vitro, raising the question of whether PLMs can capture and predict features of B cell selection in vivo. Here, we explore how general and antibody-specific PLM-generated sequence pseudolikelihoods (SPs) relate to features of in vivo B cell selection such as expansion, isotype usage, and somatic hypermutation (SHM) at single-cell resolution. Our results demonstrate that the type of PLM and the region of the antibody input sequence significantly affect the generated SP. Contrary to previous in vitro reports, we observe a negative correlation between SPs and binding affinity, whereas repertoire features such as SHM and isotype usage were strongly correlated with SPs. By constructing evolutionary lineage trees of B cell clones from human and mouse repertoires, we observe that SHMs are routinely among the most likely mutations suggested by PLMs and that mutating residues have lower absolute likelihoods than conserved residues. Our findings highlight the potential of PLMs to predict features of antibody selection and further suggest their potential to assist in antibody discovery and engineering.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesEvolution, MolecularAnimalsHumansMiceSomatic Hypermutation, ImmunoglobulinantibodiesB cellsprotein language modelsrepertoiresomatic hypermutation

Identifiers

PMID40825239
PMCPMC12360699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.