Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825233›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2025

AI and Machine Learning Terminology in Medicine, Psychology, and Social Sciences: Tutorial and Practical Recommendations.

Bo Cao, Russell Greiner, Andrew Greenshaw, Jie Sui

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bo CaoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, 4-142A Katz Group Centre for Research, 11315 - 87 Ave NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada, 1 7804929576.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9338-3271
Russell GreinerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, 4-142A Katz Group Centre for Research, 11315 - 87 Ave NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada, 1 7804929576.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8327-934X
Andrew GreenshawDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, 4-142A Katz Group Centre for Research, 11315 - 87 Ave NW, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7, Canada, 1 7804929576.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9097-900X
Jie SuiSchool of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4031-4456

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Recent applications of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in medicine, psychology, and social sciences have led to common terminological confusions. In this paper, we review emerging evidence from systematic reviews documenting widespread misuse of key terms, particularly "prediction" being applied to studies merely demonstrating association or retrospective analysis. We clarify when "prediction" should be used and recommend using "prospective prediction" for future prediction; explain validation procedures essential for model generalizability; discuss overfitting and generalization in machine learning and traditional regression methods; clarify relationships between features, independent variables, predictors, risk factors, and causal factors; and clarify the hierarchical relationship between AI, machine learning, deep learning, large language models, and generative AI. We provide evidence-based recommendations for terminology use that can facilitate clearer communication among researchers from different disciplines and between the research community and the public, ultimately advancing the rigorous application of AI in medicine, psychology, and social sciences.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningPsychologySocial SciencesTerminology as TopicHumansSystematic Reviews as Topicartificial intelligencedeep learningmachine learningmedicinepredictionprospective predictionpsychologyregressionsocial sciencesterminologytutorialvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40825233
PMCPMC12360722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.