Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825207›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025

The Prevalence and Predictors of Digital Proxy Behavior in the United States: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Pin Sym Foong, Camellia Zakaria, Pavithren Pakianathan, Andrew Ian-Hong Phua, Gerald Ch Koh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pin Sym Foong *Telehealth Core, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, 65 6516 4988.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4437-8326
Camellia Zakaria *Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4520-9783
Pavithren PakianathanLudwig Boltzmann Institut für digitale Gesundheit und Prävention, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2232-3658
Andrew Ian-Hong PhuaNational University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7284-0426
Gerald Ch KohTelehealth Core, National University of Singapore, 12 Science Drive 2, #10-01, Singapore, 117549, Singapore, 65 6516 4988.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6453-6897

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As dependent adults increasingly require help with managing web-based financial and medical tasks, caregivers often step in to assist-sometimes informally, by sharing login credentials. Despite growing reliance on such digital proxies, limited data exist on the scale of this behavior, who performs it, and how they access accounts. Informal access practices may pose privacy and security risks and increase the potential for elder abuse. Objective: The aim of this study is to quantify the prevalence of digital proxy behavior in the United States, identify demographic and caregiving predictors of proxy roles, and examine the extent of formal versus informal access methods in medical and financial domains. Methods: A nationally representative survey (n=657) was conducted among US adults from December 2022 to February 2023. The survey assessed the participants' life experience of digital proxy behavior, physical caregiving, demographics, and methods and motivations for accessing others' digital accounts. Logistic regression models were used to analyze predictors of financial and medical digital proxy behavior separately. Results: In the United States, digital proxy behavior is prevalent and often driven by usability challenges rather than the care recipient's physical or cognitive limitations. Roughly 49% of respondents reported having had digital proxy duties, with 59% assisting in both medical and financial domains. Predictors of being a digital proxy included being younger, male, more educated, and providing physical care. Additionally, higher income predicted financial proxy behavior, while having more siblings and being from a majority ethnicity predicted medical proxy behavior. Approximately one-third of digital proxies used informal access methods-translating to about 18 million adults nationally. About 10% of the sample logged on by knowing the account owner's credentials, and about 7% of the sample used the accounts without the owner's presence. Older female proxies were more likely to use formal access methods. Conclusions: Informal access practices are widespread and pose potential risks to vulnerable adults. Although most proxies used formal access when available, a significant portion have used insecure, informal methods. Policymakers and system designers should aim to promote secure, user-friendly proxy features and balance access with monitoring mechanisms that balance usability, privacy, and abuse prevention.

Indexed as

CaregiversProxyAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultagingcaregiversdigital proxypatientssurvey

Identifiers

PMID40825207
PMCPMC12360674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.