ArticleThe Prostate2025
Confirmation of BIK and SAMHD1 as Prostate Cancer Susceptibility Genes.
Article in The Prostate, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Haplotype GWAS in Colorectal Cancer Patients with a Family History of Gastric or Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo independently assess data for recently reported genes-BIK, SAMHD1, FAM111A, and AOX1-in which rare variants have been associated with prostate cancer (PCa) risk and aggressiveness.
methodsThe study included 4448 PCa cases from Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and 103,221 population-based controls from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD). Gene-based and variant-based association tests were performed within each major ancestry group using Fisher's exact test and Firth logistic regression. Bonferroni-corrected significance thresholds were applied to account for multiple testing. RESULTS AND
conclusionIn the NFE population, suggestive statistical evidence of association with PCa risk was found for two of the four genes, BIK and SAMHD1. The evidence was primarily driven by missense variants: BIK S87G and SAMHD1 Q465K and V112I. The effect sizes of these variants were stronger than, or comparable to, those of well-established PCa risk variants such as HOXB13 G84E and CHEK2 T367fs. A weak association signal was observed between AOX1 and PCa aggressiveness. Statistical power was limited for analyses in other ancestry groups, particularly for tests of PCa aggressiveness. Implication of BIK and SAMHD1 as PCa susceptibility genes represents a major breakthrough since the discovery of HOXB13 in 2012 and may have clinical utility for risk stratification and contribute to our understanding of the molecular etiology of PCa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.