Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825031›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

Dynamics of recombination, X inactivation and centromere proteins during stick insect spermatogenesis.

Zoé Dumas, William Toubiana, Marie Delattre, Tanja Schwander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zoé DumasDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9014-8356
William ToubianaDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4390-2165
Marie DelattreLaboratory of Biology and Modeling of the Cell, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5239, Inserm U1293, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1640-0300
Tanja SchwanderDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-5374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In eukaryotes, the cellular processes contributing to gamete formation form the building blocks of genetic inheritance across generations. While traditionally viewed as conserved across model organisms, emerging studies reveal significant variation in meiotic and post-meiotic processes. Extending our knowledge to non-model organisms is therefore critical to improve our understanding of the evolutionary origin and significance of modifications associated with gamete formation. We describe the cytological patterns underlying chromosome segregation, recombination, and meiotic sex chromosome inactivation during male meiosis in the stick insect group Timema. Our results provide a detailed description of centromere protein loading dynamics during spermatogenesis, and further reveal that 1) recombination initiates before synapsis (unlike Drosophila meiosis), and 2) that the X remains actively silenced despite two waves of transcriptional activation in autosomes during spermatogenesis. Together, our observations help understand the evolutionary significance of key cellular events related to spermatogenesis and shed light on the diversity of their associated molecular processes among species, including Timema stick insects.

Indexed as

CentromereInsectaRecombination, GeneticSpermatogenesisX Chromosome InactivationAnimalsChromosome PairingChromosome SegregationMaleMeiosisX Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID40825031
PMCPMC12393702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.