ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Resilience, ingenuity, and identity: A multi-level analysis of the Filipino community health worker experience in rural and remote municipalities in the Philippines.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Locus-of-Hope Enhancement Program for Filipino Community Health Workers' Hope and Well-Being: A Parallel Randomized Alternative-Treatments Study.Journal of community psychology · 2026Trial
- Adoption of an Electronic Decision Support Tool for Capacity Building of Community Health Workers: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
- Correction: Resilience, ingenuity, and identity: A multi-level analysis of the Filipino community health worker experience in rural and remote municipalities in the Philippines.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community Health Workers (CHWs) have an extensive involvement in augmenting service capacities in primary care settings. This study sheds light on the unique experiences of CHWs as they navigate barriers and enablers in the Philippine healthcare setting through their journey for professionalization. This study aims to: (1) Describe the roles assumed by CHWs in rural and remote municipalities in the Philippines; and (2) Identify the multi-level barriers and enablers CHWs perceive to influence their performance of these roles. From June to July 2023, the Philippine Primary Care Studies parent program piloted a study on a clinical decision support tool for CHWs, involving 34 CHWs across six focus group discussions. The interviews also touched upon the roles of CHWs and the factors influencing their performance within their local health settings in-depth. A mixed inductive/deductive approach was used to investigate this subset of the FGD data. CHWs assume diverse roles that often surpass health service provision. While their roles were crucial, CHWs described being positioned against a volatile political landscape fraught with material insecurity. They utilized their individual and interpersonal capacities to overcome situational limitations and were augmented with organizational level interventions like improved network connectivity, training, or expanded access to clinical decision-support tools. Amidst resource scarcity, CHWs demonstrated remarkable resilience through their own ingenuity and by maximizing support from their social networks. While their commitment is an asset to the health workforce, support from national policymakers and local governments units are crucial to ensure CHWs remain protected against systemic exploitation. Ensuring accountability and stronger implementation of pre-existing laws to ultimately recognize the role of CHWs are an essential way to support CHWs and improve community health.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.