Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40825011›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

A systematic approach to study the effects of acquisition parameters and biological factors on computerized mammography analysis using ex vivo human tissue: A protocol description.

Nicole Hernández, Tomppa Pakarinen, Annukka Salminen, Santiago Laguna Castro, Ulla Karhunen-Enckell, Markus Hannula, Ritva Heljasvaara, Jari Hyttinen, Katriina Joensuu, Otto Jokelainen and 17 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Nicole HernándezFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9391-7157
Tomppa PakarinenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Annukka SalminenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Santiago Laguna CastroComputational Biophysics and Imaging Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ulla Karhunen-EnckellFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Markus HannulaComputational Biophysics and Imaging Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ritva HeljasvaaraFaculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Jari HyttinenComputational Biophysics and Imaging Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1850-3055
Katriina JoensuuDepartment of Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Otto JokelainenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Arja JukkolaDepartment of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Sanna-Maria KarppinenFaculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Auni LindgrenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Eero LääperiFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Emilia PeuhuInstitute of Biomedicine, Cancer Laboratory FICAN West, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Taina PihlajaniemiFaculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Renata Prunskaite-HyyryläinenFaculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Kirsi RillaInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Pekka RuusuvuoriFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Leena LatonenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Teemu TolonenDepartment of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
Masi ValkonenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Mira ValkonenFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Miska VuorlaaksoFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Said PertuzDepartment of Electrical, Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Bucaramanga, Colombia.
Irina Rinta-KiikkaFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Otso ArponenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, North Savo, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8541-0126

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMammography is the most common imaging modality for the detection of breast cancer. Artificial intelligence algorithms for mammography analysis have shown promising performance for breast cancer risk assessment and lesion detection and classification; however, these models often fail the test of external validation. The evidence points to variations in image acquisition-known as the batch effect-as a main contributing factor to the lack of the models generalization and robustness. However, studies on the effects of acquisition in the mammogram have been limited due to lack of appropriate datasets. This prospective, exploratory, non-randomized study aims to study how biological and non-biological sources of heterogeneity affect the mammogram and, in turn, the computerized models for mammography analysis. METHODOLOGY: This study will collect breast samples from 200 participants that will undergo breast resection as per clinical indications. Each sample will undergo the mammography imaging procedure several times to obtain mammograms with different combinations of imaging parameters. The resulting dataset will be used for the statistical analysis of the impact of imaging parameters in mammographic texture features and the computerized analysis of mammograms. Furthermore, biological information will be collected from the resected breast samples to study their relation to mammographic texture features. DISCUSSION: This study will add to the understanding of the effect of different sources of heterogeneity on mammography, ultimately aiding in the future development of robust computerized analysis models.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMammographyRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedAdultAlgorithmsFemaleHumansProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID40825011
PMCPMC12360507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.