ArticlePloS one2025
A systematic approach to study the effects of acquisition parameters and biological factors on computerized mammography analysis using ex vivo human tissue: A protocol description.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMammography is the most common imaging modality for the detection of breast cancer. Artificial intelligence algorithms for mammography analysis have shown promising performance for breast cancer risk assessment and lesion detection and classification; however, these models often fail the test of external validation. The evidence points to variations in image acquisition-known as the batch effect-as a main contributing factor to the lack of the models generalization and robustness. However, studies on the effects of acquisition in the mammogram have been limited due to lack of appropriate datasets. This prospective, exploratory, non-randomized study aims to study how biological and non-biological sources of heterogeneity affect the mammogram and, in turn, the computerized models for mammography analysis. METHODOLOGY: This study will collect breast samples from 200 participants that will undergo breast resection as per clinical indications. Each sample will undergo the mammography imaging procedure several times to obtain mammograms with different combinations of imaging parameters. The resulting dataset will be used for the statistical analysis of the impact of imaging parameters in mammographic texture features and the computerized analysis of mammograms. Furthermore, biological information will be collected from the resected breast samples to study their relation to mammographic texture features. DISCUSSION: This study will add to the understanding of the effect of different sources of heterogeneity on mammography, ultimately aiding in the future development of robust computerized analysis models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.