ArticlePloS one2025
Magnitude, distribution and determinants of non-utilization of antenatal care services among women in low- and middle-income countries: Insights for implementation of WHO recommendations.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPregnancy is a pivotal stage that fosters health and prepares women and their families for the transition to parenthood. Antenatal care (ANC) encompasses the services provided by skilled healthcare professionals to pregnant women and adolescent girls, ensuring optimal health outcomes for both mother and child throughout pregnancy. The majority of maternal and child deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where access to essential healthcare services, including ANC, remains a significant challenge. This study was aimed to assess the magnitude, spatial distribution, and determinants of non-utilization of ANC services in LMICs.
methodsThis study analyzed data from the most recent Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2015 and 2024, encompassing a total of 47 LMICs. The analysis included a weighted sample of 480,068 women. We employed spatial analysis to illustrate the geographic distribution of non-utilization of antenatal care and hierarchical analysis to identify contributing factors. ArcGIS 10.8 and Stata 17 were utilized for spatial and hierarchical analysis, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and factors were considered statistically significant at a p-value of less than 0.05.
resultsPooled magnitude of non-utilization of ANC among women in LMICs was at 10.59%, ranging from 40.05% in Afghanistan to 0.76% in Burundi, with many regions in several countries identified as hotspots for ANC non-utilization. Factors significantly associated with higher odds of non-utilization included having no (AOR = 3.28; 95% CI: 3.02-3.55) or low (primary schooling: AOR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.67-1.96, and secondary schooling: AOR = 1.28; 95% CI: 1.18-1.38) education, being unmarried (AOR = 1.35; 95% CI: 1.29-1.41), lower wealth index (poorest: AOR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.77-1.98), poorer: AOR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.38-1.54, middle: AOR = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.11-1.24, and richer: AOR = 1.09; 95% CI: 1.04-1.15), having no media exposure (AOR = 1.68; 95% CI: 1.64-1.73), residing in rural areas (AOR = 1.05; 95% CI: 1.02-1.09), facing distance issues to health facilities (AOR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.28-1.34), and the low-income level of the countries (AOR = 2.27; 95% CI: 1.23-6.74).
conclusionA significant proportion of women in LMICs have not utilized antenatal care services. Factors at the individual, community, and country levels contribute to this non-utilization. Policymakers should focus on addressing these barriers to achieve the WHO recommendation of eight or more ANC contacts in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.