ArticlePloS one2025
English validation of the Multidimensional Scale of Motives for Postponing Parenthood (MSMPP-18-EN): Factorial structure, psychometric properties, and correlates.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionWhile the literature on deferred parenthood is rich in analyses of this topic from a sociological and medical point of view, psychological research is in the minority. The analysis also shows that there are no questionnaires to measure motives for postponing parenthood. This gap is filled by the Multidimensional Scale of Motives for Postponing Parenthood (MSMPP-18) which assesses the motivational forces that may lead to the decision to postpone parenthood. Given that most studies and articles on deferred parenthood are reported in English, the two main goals of Studies 1-3 reported in the present research were to: 1) validate the original Polish version of the MSMPP-18 into English; 2) confirm its convergent validity.
methodsThe original version of the MSMPP-18 was translated into English by two independent psychologists fluent in academic English using a traditional forward-backward translation technique. The factorial structure of the MSMPP-18-EN and its psychometric characteristics were verified through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The criterion validity of the scale was examined using the correlation between the motives for postponing parenthood and a nomological set of variables in Studies 1-3 (total N = 664; n1 = 247; n2 = 239; n3 = 178).
resultsThe CFA statistics provided empirical evidence that the MSMPP-18-EN has good fit indices across Studies 1-3, both for the first-order model and the second-order model. The research confirmed that the English-language version of the scale reveals factors analogous to the original scale: 1) feeling of uncertainty and incompetence; 2) self-focus; 3) parenthood as a burden; 4) fear of change; 5) financial security concerns; and 6) worry about a child's future. The values of Cronbach's alpha (Studies 1-3: 0.75-0.95; 0.68-0.93; 0.77-0.93), McDonald's Omega (Studies 1-3: 0.76-0.96; 0.73-0.93; 0.79-0.93), and CR (Studies 1-3: 0.89-0.97; 0.80-0.99; 0.78-0.99) displayed good internal reliability. Data from Studies 1-3 also showed that procrastination, future anxiety, need for closure, negative emotions toward God, and family disfunction positively and significantly correlated with motives for delayed parenthood and its overall score. On the other hand, motives of postponed parenthood were negatively and significantly correlated with psychological capital, social support, positive emotions toward God, life satisfaction, self-efficacy, and self-regulation.
conclusionsThe presented validation of what is probably the first scale measuring the motives for deferred parenthood allows us to assume that the MSMPP-18-EN tool in the English version meets the theoretical and empirical criteria of a good questionnaire.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.