Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40824941›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Unsupervised fake news detection on social media using hybrid Gaussian Mixture Model.

Sajida Perveen, Muhammad Shahbaz, Sami S Albouq, Khlood Shinan, Hanan E Alhazmi, Fatmah Alanazi, M Usman Ashraf, Rehan Ashraf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sajida PerveenDepartment of computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad ShahbazDepartment of Computer Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
Sami S AlbouqFaculty of Computer and Information Systems, Islamic University of Madinah, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
Khlood ShinanDepartment of Computers, College of Engineering and Computers in Al-Lith, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Hanan E AlhazmiDepartment of Cybersecurity, College of Computing, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Fatmah AlanaziComputer Science Department, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Imam Muhammad Bin Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
M Usman AshrafDepartment of Computer Science, GC Women University Sialkot, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7341-8625
Rehan AshrafDepartment of computer Science, National Textile University, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rise of social media has revolutionized information dissemination, creating new opportunities but also significant challenges. One such challenge is the proliferation of fake news, which undermines the credibility of journalism and contributes to societal unrest. Manually identifying fake news is impractical due to the vast volume of content, prompting the development of automated systems for fake news detection. This challenge has motivated numerous research efforts aimed at developing automated systems for fake news detection. However, most of these approaches rely on supervised learning, which requires significant time and effort to construct labeled datasets. While there have been a few attempts to develop unsupervised methods for fake news detection, their reported accuracy results thereof remain unsatisfactory. This research proposes an unsupervised approach using clustering algorithms, including Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM), K-means, and K-medoids, to eliminate the need for manual labeling in detecting fake news. In particular, it also proposes a novel hybrid method that leverages the Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) in conjunction with the Group Counseling Optimizer (GCO), a metaheuristic optimization algorithm, to identify the optimal number of clusters for the detection of fake news. The comparative analysis of the evaluation results on real-world data demonstrated that the proposed hybrid GMM outperforms the state-of-the-art techniques, with a silhouette score of 0.77, ARI of 0.83, and a purity score of 0.88, indicating a significantly improved quality of clustering results.

Indexed as

DeceptionInformation DisseminationSocial MediaAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisHumansNormal Distribution

Identifiers

PMID40824941
PMCPMC12360590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.