ArticlePloS one2025
Changes in emotional distress among Ontario education workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: 2021-2023.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEducation workers experienced increased stress during the COVID-19 pandemic adapting to changing work locations, workload, and pedagogical approaches as well as dealing with pandemic-induced personal life stress.
methodsThe goal of this Canadian prospective cohort study was to determine whether levels of distress, as measured by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10), varied significantly over the course of the study (February 18, 2021 to December 22, 2023) among Ontario education workers after adjusting for demographic, work-related, and temporal factors. Exposure data were collected at enrollment and updated annually while vaccination and illness surveys were completed as needed. The K10 was completed periodically throughout the study. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess factors associated with changes in K10 scores.
resultsOn average, K10 scores fell 0.5% every four weeks over the 34-month long study. However, the mean score, that decreased from 23.1 at study start to 19.3 by study end, remained above the cut-off of 15, indicating no ongoing emotional distress. Lower distress scores were also associated with non-winter seasons, older age, being male, and being in very good/excellent health. Alternatively, higher K10 scores were associated with being on medications to reduce anxiety, depression, or sleeping problems, return-to-workplace periods after school lockdowns, and periods of intense non-pharmacological interventions.
conclusionEarly identification of people most likely to experience distress is needed so that stress remediation strategies can be quickly implemented. Younger, female education workers with lower rated subjective health, who are taking medications to reduce anxiety, depression, or sleeping problems are likely to be at the highest risk. Recognizing periods that intensify stressful situations, such as pandemics and intervals within them, is important to anticipate the need for assistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.